Green hosting guide

Kinsta vs WP Engine: green hosting compared

Kinsta and WP Engine side by side: each one's Green Web Foundation listing, where its data centres are and how carbon-intensive those grids are, and the evidence it publishes. They are in alphabetical order: no host pays for its place.

The difference

Only Kinsta is listed in the Green Web Foundation's directory of verified green providers; we found no matching entry for WP Engine.

Neither host's listed countries all have lower-carbon grids than the other's. Across both, their countries' grid averages run from 35 gCO2e/kWh in Sweden (2025) to 705 gCO2e/kWh in Indonesia (2025), so which grid your site runs on depends on the region you choose.

These are the facts we can show, not a verdict on which is greener: the listing, the grids and each company's own claims measure different things, and none of them measures your website. Each host's full page has every quote and source.

Grid carbon intensity where Kinsta and WP Engine list data centres

Each dot is a country where the host lists data centres, placed by that country's grid average. Kinsta, listed in the Green Web Foundation's directory: 24 countries, from 35 gCO2e/kWh in Sweden to 705 in Indonesia. WP Engine, no matching entry in the Green Web Foundation's directory: 9 countries, from 57 gCO2e/kWh in Finland to 518 in Australia.

Show the data as a table
Each country, lowest grid average first, and which host lists it
CountryGrid average, gCO2e/kWhYearKinstaWP Engine
Sweden352025YesNo
Switzerland392025YesNo
France412025YesNo
Finland572025NoYes
Brazil1092025YesNo
Belgium1512025NoYes
Spain1532025YesNo
Colombia1902025YesNo
Canada1922025YesYes
United Kingdom2182025YesYes
Netherlands2542025YesYes
Italy2842025YesNo
Chile2912025YesNo
Germany3342025YesNo
United States3842025YesYes
South Korea4182025YesNo
United Arab Emirates4702025YesNo
Japan4742025YesNo
Mexico4812025YesNo
Israel4932025YesYes
Singapore4972025YesYes
Australia5182025YesYes
India6712025YesNo
Saudi Arabia6802025YesNo
South Africa6992025YesNo
Indonesia7052025YesNo

Kinsta

Green Web Foundation

Listed in the Green Web Foundation's directory of verified green providers, checked 17 October 2026.

GWF lists it as “Kinsta” (provider 1226).

GWF does not publish when a provider was last verified. Providers verified before October 2026 are reassessed under its new criteria, which no longer accept offsets, at their next reverification.

What GWF verification means, and its new criteria

Data centres

South Africa, Indonesia, Australia, India, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Canada, Netherlands, Germany, Spain, Italy, France, Sweden, Switzerland, Israel, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Colombia, Chile, Brazil, United Kingdom and United States

The data centres a customer can choose, now on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure; Kinsta previously ran on Google Cloud.

Grid average where they are
Across the listed countries, from 35 gCO2e/kWh in Sweden (2025) to 705 gCO2e/kWh in Indonesia (2025).
Kinsta's own evidence
Evidence checked
16 October 2026

Everything we found on Kinsta

WP Engine

Green Web Foundation

No matching entry in the Green Web Foundation's directory when we checked on 17 October 2026.

We looked for a provider with WP Engine's website and found none. That says nothing either way about the energy behind its hosting; the evidence below is WP Engine's own.

What GWF verification means, and its new criteria

Data centres

United States, Canada, Belgium, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Finland, Australia, Singapore and Israel

Shared plans run on Google Cloud in these countries; premium plans can also use AWS or Azure, in more countries.

Grid average where they are
Across the listed countries, from 57 gCO2e/kWh in Finland (2025) to 518 gCO2e/kWh in Australia (2025).
WP Engine's own evidence
Evidence checked
16 October 2026

Everything we found on WP Engine

Grid figures: Ember, Yearly electricity data (2026), CC BY 4.0. Listing data from the Green Web Foundation's Green Web Dataset, made available under the Open Database License (ODbL).

Back to top